Week 37: Unfairness, Burnout, and the Brain’s Hidden Pathways to Powerlessness—and What to Do About It

A time to rethink your strategy

bestdesigns/iStockphoto

What does it mean to live a good life when the world is unfair?

For Aristotle, the eudaimonic life—a life of flourishing—was one grounded in reason, virtue, and social contribution. But how does one pursue such a life in a world where systemic unfairness quietly (or violently) rearranges the terms of possibility?

Modern burnout, especially when tethered to perceived or real injustice, is not just a psychological state—it is a philosophical rupture. It arises when the world violates your internal sense of rightness, and the external systems you rely on no longer support your efforts to live well.

Unfairness and the Fragmentation of the Self

From a neuroscientific standpoint, the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) lights up when you are the one being treated unfairly. This is the region tied to self-referential thinking—a hub of identity, moral reasoning, and agency.

When unfairness hits, especially in systems that don’t allow redress, the MPFC can go from a seat of thoughtful reflection to a node of despair. You stop asking, “What can I do?” and start feeling, “There’s nothing I can do.”

This is the neural signature of learned helplessness, the emotional twin of injustice.

Aristotle’s Warning: Injustice Undermines Virtue

Aristotle famously argued that justice is the highest of all virtues, “because it is the application of virtue to others.” Justice, for him, was about right proportion—not just legality, but balance, fairness, and moral symmetry.

When a person is repeatedly exposed to unfairness, especially without power to respond, it creates a schism. One begins to internalize injustice, undermining phronesis (practical wisdom), and replacing hope with resignation.

This leads to what we now call burnout, but what Aristotle might have named a failure of the polis to support flourishing.

O’Connor’s Insight: Unfairness as a Social Design Flaw

Elizabeth O’Connor’s work shows how coordination games—the social contracts we inherit—often rely on conventional categories (gender, race, class) to determine roles. These systems don’t just create unfair outcomes by accident; they often stabilize inequity as the default state.

The problem? These systems teach some people to expect more, and others to expect less. The result is not just inequality—it’s a form of ethical anesthesia. We stop noticing what's wrong. Or worse, we think it's inevitable.

The Philosophical Implication: Agency Must Be Reclaimed

Burnout from unfairness is not just about exhaustion. It is about being thwarted in the pursuit of a good life. And if, as Aristotle insisted, “the function of man is an activity of soul in accordance with reason,” then any structure that blinds a person to their capacity to reason, desire, and act ethically is fundamentally degrading to the human spirit.

Thus, healing from unfairness is not just psychological—it is a philosophical act of resistance.

10 Philosophically-Informed Tips to Reclaim Agency in an Unfair World: